Why do some people prefer watching movies than reading novels even if they are both based on the same source material (book)?

PC: The Guardian

Sometimes the production team of the movie is just better than the author of the novel, correspondingly:

You'll not work to get something you can get by just paying for a Netflix subscription.

Meta's CTO says OpenAI's Sam Altman countered Meta's massive AI signing bonuses - Business Insider

Many people just survive school and college just preparing their study material and do not have enough aptitude in any language to be able to read and comprehensively understand long texts.

Netflix and chill is a thing:

If you have to work too hard to get entertained, it may not appeal to you. And for some people, reading is too hard a work and watching a movie is simply easier.

Why is my ex trying to provoke an argument with me?

Many people do not have a comprehensive vocabulary in any language required to sail through a literary work in it, leave alone the one which their material of interest is printed in. Not all of us will patiently read with a dictionary by our sides.

Have the ability to visualize:

But take one of his plays and make me a movie and I'd love to watch. I loved “A Midsummer Night’s Dream”as a movie more than the play all because of the writing style. I am used to reading proper prose in novels. Not the script of plays. So the movie worked better for me.

Montana warns of new disease-carrying tick species in the state - KREM

Granted that the examples I might be citing here are as such not great works, but bear with me.

Very hard to do the above very enjoyable couple/group/friends activity with books.

Bella in the movies remained the eff shut up, so I could just use both my own imagination and enjoy the director’s vision.

Are democrats eating crow?

The novels? I picked up Eclipse, and a few sentences showing the various ruminations of Bella were enough to make me hate her already. I didn't attempt to read.

Turns out, the translation is not the slang you speak in real life but is a formal proper language and you suck at that as well.

PC: Google

10-year Treasury yield rises ahead of key jobs report - CNBC

Entertainment.

Many if not most, are in this category.

PC: Google (Romeo and Juliet)

Has anyone had a romance scammer start messaging them on Quora? How do you know if the person is scamming you? What do you do?

Actually have some literary skill:

Because reading is WORK. Period.

Her orgasmic thoughts were thankfully absent in the movie so the movie was way better. Still bad enough that I just watched the first and passed the rest.

What's a band that is really popular that you don't like? Why?

In the end, if nothing else, a movie is just a touch and earphones away. A book requires concentration. The lazier option is always more appealing.

I gave up and enjoyed the movies, read the discussions on the original text and enjoyed it immensely.

But no one will have any problem in watching a dubbed version of GoT and all the titillating scenes in it are further incentive to brave through it effortlessly. No skill required.

Addison Rae’s debut album proves her evolution from influencer to pop heavyweight is complete - The Independent

Even if one has the skill, many people lack the ability to imagine and visualize the scenes portrayed in words, which dampens their novel experience. It's just a bunch of words to them.

PC: Google

PC: Google

What would Spanish sound like if only latin and Greek words were used, like some romance analogy to anglish?

Reading a novel, especially a fictional novel with immense imagery, and enjoying it on par with or more than you'd enjoy a movie requires you to:

I don't have the patience to read Shakespeare and visualize the story because of the old lyrical English therein. Not much for poetic/dramatic words.

PC: Google…my precious!

What was your first trans experience like?

Or the movie script may have taken the source material and derived its own form of storytelling, which may prove to be more interesting than the novel’s storytelling style.

Twilight at least was somewhat decently written. The Grey series was not even good writing.

PC: Google

World Aquatics Takes Tough Stance on Enhanced Games - Newser

Outdated language but easily understandable presentation in cinema:

How many of you found the Twilight franchise and 50 shades of Grey trilogy at least somewhat entertaining as movies? I did!

Unless you have a reading habit as such, you cannot read fast and comprehensively enough to not just process the words and sentences, but also to feel the phrase, sentence, paragraph, page or chapter as a whole.

AI Finally Cracks Decades-Long Mars Mystery That Has Baffled Scientists - The Daily Galaxy

A movie may have taken some creative license and given us a more feel good ending that is more appealing to audiences than the original book storyline.

Twilight was a fun watch - I suspended my brain and enjoyed the imaginary world.

Let's be frank. What is in fiction for us unless we are forced to study it at school?

So a novel may be less enjoyable for them.

Imagery, sequence, suspense, emotions. Some authors may not be able to bring the story out the way a movie director could.

Sometimes, maybe you aren't good at English so you find it hard to read an English book, say, Game of Thrones, in its original format. So you buy a translated version in your mother tongue, say Tamil or Hindi (hypothetically).

Some translated books are just not good. Ponniyin Selvan is an example.

This is often a mindset. It can be acquired and often comes naturally to those who have a reading habit as such, but there are a number of people who do try and are unable to carry this conversion out effectively - maybe something to do with the creative/imaginative centres of the brain.

The Grey series was steamy but I was still able to focus on the actual story in the movies.

There is also the issue of translation and language barrier.

I didn't like the English translated version at all and I am not that good at literary Tamil to read the original.

There are some books that just…suck!

The books, however, were insufferable. They were filled with “holy shit” and other moronic mind voices of the protagonist Anna. They effectively drowned out the story and I quit midway of 50 shades darker

There is an actual condition - aphantasia- wherein you lack the ability to imagine/visualise.

A story is just a sequence of events but storytelling involves a lot more. With words alone, it's already a handicap, but even there, not all authors are created the same.

So what you see on screen is fun, visually entertaining, well put-together as opposed to a novel that may have been tiring, boring and not well placed.